Our Mental Wellness? What's Next?

I just learned today that the government just launched a new website from the United States Department of Health and Human Services called, "Getting Through Tough Economic Times." My first thought was...are you kidding me? I'm sure that the government has good intentions, but do they want us to turn to them now for our mental wellness when it was because of government intervention that played a HUGE role in the current state of our economy! Are you kidding me? Are we going to turn to the government for every possible thing that we may need as Americans? What's next? I dare to imagine because it will probably happen. We didn't need a website after 9/11...why? I'll tell you why...we relied on other people for comfort and support. Not the government. Can you imagine your grandfather coming home after fighting in World War II, crying and saying I hope the government launches a website so I can learn how to get through this tough time. We are stronger than that America! Wake up and think for yourselves!


Bailouts are the Problem

Big-government policies are at the root of the AIG bonus controversy, explains Heritage Foundation expert Brian Darling. "Conservatives are outraged by the bonuses, but know that bonuses aren't the problem—the bailouts are."

Darling blames the bailouts, which were first implemented under President Bush, for increasing government's belief that it is entitled to own and direct much of the economy. For instance, the federal government now owns 80 percent of AIG's stock. What's more, the bailouts have been used to further encroach on private sector prerogatives.

Unfortunately, it doesn't look like the intrusion of government into the private sector will end with the bailouts. The budget contains massive new taxes and spending that would further expand the size and scope of the federal government.

Ironically, many of President Obama's budget policies resemble President Bush's, except that they'll cost taxpayers even more. "President Obama's only real divergence [from his predecessor] is his proposal to raise taxes steeply," argues Heritage budget expert Brian Riedl. "Yet all these tax increases would go toward expanding government. None would reduce budget deficits even back to President Bush's levels."

Riedl highlights just a few of the new President's costly and expansive budget objectives:

$1 trillion — the expansion of government under the President's budget proposal, a figure which does not include spending on the "stimulus";

$646 billion — the cost to consumers of the cap-and-tax energy plan, which could cost each household from $650 to $2,000 annually;

$634 billion — the size of the new healthcare reserve fund; and

$8,000 — the increase in Washington's annual spending per household, which will rise from $24,000 to $32,000.

And how do we pay for it all? "Anyone who believes all these costs can be paid by the wealthiest 2 percent of taxpayers is dreaming," Riedl says. "We'll all be paying this tab for decades."
Yet the Left continues to prescribe more government — and more bailouts — for the nation's economic woes. If these pricey policies are enacted, the American people can expect little change, in any sense of the word, from the Obama administration. —Amanda Reinecker, Heritage.org

Conspiracy or Ignorance?

There is one campaign promise that President Obama is definitely keeping and sticking to his guns...spending. Instead of the $1 trillion that he estimated before the election; with his new budget, after being in office just sixty days Obama's budget proposal is estimated to be over $3 trillion! The Congressional Budget Office last week estimated Obama's plan would cost more than $9 trillion over the next 10 years.

Former GOP presidential candidate Fred Thompson told CNN's John Roberts on Wednesday that he wants Obama's policies that "I believe take us in the wrong direction to fail."

"If he takes us down the road of tripling our national debt in 10 years and making us vulnerable to higher interest rates and higher inflation, and things of that nature, I want all those policies not to succeed," he said.

A part of me asks the question is this all a conspiracy to lead our nation to socialism or is it just plain ignorance on Obama's part? I hope it's just ignorance and his lack of inexperience. Big government spending and higher taxes is NOT the way to get out of a recession and to promote economic growth. Tax cuts for individuals and tax breaks for businesses will make the economy soar. I don't see how President Obama doesn't get this concept or understand it. God help us all.


Are We A Nation Of Gullible Gulls?

To the left is a picture of Marion G. Romney. He was ordained an Apostle of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints on October 11, 1951. He served as Second Counselor to Presidents Harold B. Lee and Spencer W. Kimball and later as First Counselor to President Kimball. After President Kimball’s death, President Romney resumed his position in the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles and became President of the Quorum on November 10, 1985. He died on May 20, 1988, at the age of 90. President Romney was serving as Second Counselor in the First Presidency when he gave this talk during general conference in October 1982. This edited version of the talk was first published in 1984. It reads:

I love the simple gospel truths as taught by the holy prophets, and I never tire of speaking about them. Since the beginning of time man has been counseled to earn his own way, thereby becoming self-reliant. It is easy to understand the reason the Lord places so much emphasis on this principle when we come to understand that it is tied very closely to freedom itself.

On this subject, Elder Albert E. Bowen said, “The Church is not satisfied with any system which leaves able people permanently dependent, and insists, on the contrary, that the true function and office of giving, is to help people [get] into a position where they can help themselves and thus be free.”

Many programs have been set up by well-meaning individuals to aid those who are in need. However, many of these programs are designed with the shortsighted objective of “helping people,” as opposed to “helping people help themselves.” Our efforts must always be directed toward making able-bodied people self-reliant.

Gullible Gulls - I clipped the following article from the Reader’s Digest some time ago. It reads:

“In our friendly neighbor city of St. Augustine great flocks of sea gulls are starving amid plenty. Fishing is still good, but the gulls don’t know how to fish. For generations they have depended on the shrimp fleet to toss them scraps from the nets. Now the fleet has moved.

“The shrimpers had created a Welfare State for the sea gulls. The big birds never bothered to learn how to fish for themselves and they never taught their children to fish. Instead they led their little ones to the shrimp nets.

“Now the sea gulls, the fine free birds that almost symbolize liberty itself, are starving to death because they gave in to the ‘something for nothing’ lure! They sacrificed their independence for a handout.

“A lot of people are like that, too. They see nothing wrong in picking delectable scraps from the tax nets of the U.S. Government’s ‘shrimp fleet.’ But what will happen when the Government runs out of goods? What about our children of generations to come?

“Let’s not be gullible gulls. We must preserve our talents of self-sufficiency, our genius for creating things for ourselves, our sense of thrift and our true love of independence.”

The practice of coveting and receiving unearned benefits has now become so fixed in our society that even men of wealth, possessing the means to produce more wealth, are expecting the government to guarantee them a profit. Elections often turn on what the candidates promise to do for voters from government funds. This practice, if universally accepted and implemented in any society, will make slaves of its citizens.

We cannot afford to become wards of the government, even if we have a legal right to do so. It requires too great a sacrifice of self-respect and political, temporal, and spiritual independence.

In some countries it is extremely difficult to separate earned from unearned benefits. However, the principle is the same in all countries: We should strive to become self-reliant and not depend on others for our existence.

Governments are not the only guilty parties. We fear many parents are making “gullible gulls” out of their children with their permissiveness and their doling out of family resources. In fact, the actions of parents in this area can be more devastating than any government program.

Bishops and other priesthood leaders can be guilty of making “gullible gulls” out of their ward members. Some members become financially or emotionally dependent on their bishops. A dole is a dole whatever its source. All of our Church and family actions should be directed toward making our children and members self-reliant. We can’t always control government programs, but we can control our own homes and congregations. If we will teach these principles and live them, we can do much to counter the negative effects which may exist in government programs in any country.

We know there are some who, for reasons beyond their control, cannot become self-reliant. President Henry D. Moyle had these people in mind when he said:

“This great principle does not deny to the needy nor to the poor the assistance they should have. The wholly incapacitated, the aged, the sickly are cared for with all tenderness, but every able-bodied person is enjoined to do his utmost for himself to avoid dependence, if his own efforts can make such a course possible; to look upon adversity as temporary; to combine his faith in his own ability with honest toil.

“We believe [that] seldom [do circumstances arise in which] men of rigorous faith, genuine courage, and unfaltering determination, with the love of independence burning in their hearts, and pride in their own accomplishments, cannot surmount the obstacles that lie in their paths."

Blog Author's Comments

I ask the question: Are we a nation of gullible gulls or are we developing into a nation of gullible gulls? Are we learning to fish for ourselves or are we given fish to eat and come back for more tomorrow? With everything that's been going in our nation the past several months it seems like the majority of the people want the government to take care of their every need.

What ever happened to individuals taking personal responsibility for their actions and decisions while accepting the consequences as men or women of honor? Why on earth would you get a mortgage you know that you can't afford and then expect the government to intervene and "bail you out"? Why would you run your multi-billion corporation into the ground and then come begging Congress for billions of tax payer's dollars to "bail you out" all the while you're flying in your private jets, planning expensive retreats, and receiving millions of dollars in bonus payments and not paying millions of dollars in back taxes yourself? I'm sorry, but in the words of Devin Hathcock, "Your lack of planning [or your stupidity] does not constitute an emergency on my part."

I hope as the people of the greatest nation on earth come to a rememberance of how we got here. Remember how it was by the grace of God this nation was founded and became independent of other nations. Remember how our forefathers sacrificed everything they had to gauruntee our freedom and liberties not to have them just given away to socialism. Ronald Reagan says it best in this remix I found on YouTube of some of his speeches:

LIVE THE DREAM! How would you like to make more money, be your own boss, work your own hours, improve your standard of living, and choose the lifestyle you deserve? Click here to learn more.